Which of the following is MOST important when deciding whether to build an alternate facility or subscribe to a third-party hot site?

Which of the following is MOST important when deciding whether to build an alternate facility or subscribe to a third-party hot site?
A . Cost to build a redundant processing facility and invocation
B . Daily cost of losing critical systems and recovery time objectives (RTOs)
C . Infrastructure complexity and system sensitivity
D . Criticality results from the business impact analysis (BIA)

View Answer

Answer: C

Explanation:

The complexity and business sensitivity of the processing infrastructure and operations largely determines the viability of such an option; the concern is whether the recovery site meets the operational and security needs of the organization. The cost to build a redundant facility is not relevant since only a fraction of the total processing capacity is considered critical at the time of the disaster and recurring contract costs would accrue over time. Invocation costs are not a factor because they will be the same regardless. The incremental daily cost of losing different systems and the recovery time objectives (RTOs) do not distinguish whether a commercial facility is chosen. Resulting criticality from the business impact analysis (BIA) will determine the scope and timeline of the recovery efforts, regardless of the recovery location.