Posted by: Pdfprep
Post Date: March 16, 2021
An engineer configured access list NON-Cisco in a policy to influence routes.
route-map PBR, deny, sequence 5
Match clauses:
ip address (access-list): NON-CISCO
Set clauses:
Policy routing matches: 0 packets, 0 bytes route-map PBR, permit, sequence 10 Match clause
Set clauses ip next-hop 192.168.1.5
Policy routing matches: 388562161 packets, 222009685077 bytes
What are the two effects of this route map configuration? (choose two)
A . Packets are forwarded to the default gateway
B . Packets are evaluated by sequence 10
C . Packets are not evaluated by sequence 10
D . Packets are forwarded using normal route lookup
E . Packets are dropped by the access list.
Answer: BD
Leave a Reply